IACMC MILITARIA FORUM

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

    TRU versus HPFU

    sh4pak
    sh4pak
    Junior Lieutenant
    Junior Lieutenant


    Age : 51
    Location : Washington, DC
    Registration date : 2012-04-23
    Number of posts : 626

    TRU versus HPFU Empty TRU versus HPFU

    Post by sh4pak Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:05 pm

    --So, I have me some humble opinions. One of those opinions is that when TruSpec tells me that their TRU is the culmination of millions of combined years of research, and survey data from public health professionals... I think that they're bunking me pretty hard (especially when the product of all that knowledge looks more-or-less like ACU).

    On the other hand, when Blackhawk! tries to sell me something I think "Well, too expensive, really-- but if my LIFE depended on it, I might just swing that way." Although, at first glance... they don't seem to be deviating much from the ACU mold...

    You can decide for yourselves:

    Side by side:

    TRU versus HPFU 8452258284_37a3131546_b

    (Yeah, artefacts on my lense, I'll sort that out later).

    Then, side by side, back:

    TRU versus HPFU 8452258058_bf95e0cffd_b

    First thing you see is a big difference in the yoke. Actually, that's all you really see-- but having been a broad-shouldered man at one time in my life, I can appreciate it (Blackhawk!, for the win).

    Arm to arm:

    TRU versus HPFU 8451165553_2726914ce2_b

    Here we see that Blackhawk! has their logo here. We also see *larger* pockets of the leftward specimen.

    But!

    Open that pocket, and what do you find?

    TRU versus HPFU 8451165289_12b29cd487_b

    A... omg. You find a tourniquet.

    Tourniquets are among the many things I prefer to never, ever think about. Evidently, this particular type is approved by the US Army. It is located in a good spot, too. It *is* a trifle bulky, and I suspect that if one were running around and doing stuff of a dangerous nature, it might cramp the proverbial *style* of a movie star. Since I reckon a lot of operators actually store tourniquets in their extra pockets, however... maybe this is a good thing to have here.

    Breast to breast:

    TRU versus HPFU 8451164797_aee60c17f2_b

    Pocket slant is a big deal, isn't it? I don't know who wins this round. Pocket size, and ease of use? Again, I am uncertain, although it *does* look like Blackhawk! thought about it. Or maybe asked somebody about it. TRU look like they just nicked the Army pattern, again.

    Now, the inner-side-bits:

    TRU versus HPFU 8452256632_7440ee2fae_b

    Blackhawk!'s is elasticated. TRU's is not.

    Lower arm/ forearm:

    TRU versus HPFU 8451163445_b40b934646_b

    Hawk!'s has got another pocket. TRU's does not. (This pocket also has a tourniquet).

    Elbows:

    TRU versus HPFU 8452256346_70dac476ce_b

    Both have room for padded inserts, but the Hawk! has some rubbery-stuff in a strangely feminine pattern. Again, I have to chalk this up to them having talked to somebody about it.

    And, the fronts, respectively: Blackhawk!

    TRU versus HPFU 8452256122_c63d635e3e_b

    Looks like you could unzip it.

    Tru's:

    TRU versus HPFU 8451163687_88fc42c960_b

    Has a hook & loop stormflap. Like an ACU. Perhaps they know best... but... isn't Velcro noisy?

    In the end, I am not a steely-eyed killer, and I admit that, but, if I were to just muse on the subject for a second-- and tell you what I *really* think, I would say that the Balckhawk! version seems less about being such a killer, and more about being a survivor. Truspec's offering seems to be there for people who direct traffic to look like a bada$$.

    Which is not to say that people who direct traffic *shouldn't* look like Mad Dog Killers.

    Who am I to make the distinction?


      Current date/time is Mon Jan 20, 2025 3:38 pm