



Last edited by nkomo on Tue Jul 07, 2009 5:47 am; edited 1 time in total
Just saw that. Thanks for the link. The Propper version is differnt than the Crye Version. Interesting.derxsammler wrote:hi arch,
i've got some frog stuff too and noticed that just propper uses this odd fabric.
https://iacmc.forumotion.com/us-marines-f145/usmc-frog-t936.htm
Spartan Tactical wrote:Thanks for bringing that to my attention merc25, didn't realize that had happened.
The FROG gear in general has allot off different items ranging from the Flame retardant hoods to the Combat tops and pants. The pants specifically have more than 1 generation however the tops have went through a couple as well, the originals weren't desert MARPAT.
Spañiard wrote:Spartan Tactical wrote:Thanks for bringing that to my attention merc25, didn't realize that had happened.
The FROG gear in general has allot off different items ranging from the Flame retardant hoods to the Combat tops and pants. The pants specifically have more than 1 generation however the tops have went through a couple as well, the originals weren't desert MARPAT.
Just to mention in passing If it doesn't have the Frog EGA Tag It's not USMC Issue. Like Camalbak Gloves if the Logo isn't Stamped on the wrist glove band it's not USMC Issue, since Camalbak makes same frog glove for SF. ect., without the USMC logo.
Spartan Tactical wrote:Spañiard wrote:Spartan Tactical wrote:Thanks for bringing that to my attention merc25, didn't realize that had happened.
The FROG gear in general has allot off different items ranging from the Flame retardant hoods to the Combat tops and pants. The pants specifically have more than 1 generation however the tops have went through a couple as well, the originals weren't desert MARPAT.
Just to mention in passing If it doesn't have the Frog EGA Tag It's not USMC Issue. Like Camalbak Gloves if the Logo isn't Stamped on the wrist glove band it's not USMC Issue, since Camalbak makes same frog glove for SF. ect., without the USMC logo.
Not necessarily, the original stuff didn't have tags in it before they labeled it FROG gear. I'll have photos of both in the guide.
Spañiard wrote:Spartan Tactical wrote:Spañiard wrote:Spartan Tactical wrote:Thanks for bringing that to my attention merc25, didn't realize that had happened.
The FROG gear in general has allot off different items ranging from the Flame retardant hoods to the Combat tops and pants. The pants specifically have more than 1 generation however the tops have went through a couple as well, the originals weren't desert MARPAT.
Just to mention in passing If it doesn't have the Frog EGA Tag It's not USMC Issue. Like Camalbak Gloves if the Logo isn't Stamped on the wrist glove band it's not USMC Issue, since Camalbak makes same frog glove for SF. ect., without the USMC logo.
Not necessarily, the original stuff didn't have tags in it before they labeled it FROG gear. I'll have photos of both in the guide.
All USMC thats FROG has the Tag even the first ones that came out, the Stuff thats FROG with no tag is Issued to US SF. ect. and thats what you have a picture of. Per say I have two balaclava same Style both are FROG one has the USMC Frog logo the other doesn't and that goes for my Inner shirts and underwear also.
Spartan Tactical wrote:Spañiard wrote:Spartan Tactical wrote:Spañiard wrote:Spartan Tactical wrote:Thanks for bringing that to my attention merc25, didn't realize that had happened.
The FROG gear in general has allot off different items ranging from the Flame retardant hoods to the Combat tops and pants. The pants specifically have more than 1 generation however the tops have went through a couple as well, the originals weren't desert MARPAT.
Just to mention in passing If it doesn't have the Frog EGA Tag It's not USMC Issue. Like Camalbak Gloves if the Logo isn't Stamped on the wrist glove band it's not USMC Issue, since Camalbak makes same frog glove for SF. ect., without the USMC logo.
Not necessarily, the original stuff didn't have tags in it before they labeled it FROG gear. I'll have photos of both in the guide.
All USMC thats FROG has the Tag even the first ones that came out, the Stuff thats FROG with no tag is Issued to US SF. ect. and thats what you have a picture of. Per say I have two balaclava same Style both are FROG one has the USMC Frog logo the other doesn't and that goes for my Inner shirts and underwear also.
Not necessarily, they were designed and distributed by the same company. The only difference between the two is one was distributed to the army and one to the marines. Considering I was in Iraq when the stuff was first distributed, before the implementation of the newer desert marpat stuff the usual replace was just a regular nomex desert flight suit. The guide will be finished up today hopefully like I said Ill post a link. Ill throw up a post momentarily with a couple photos in the meantime.
oceanfront wrote:Hi i just picked up a pair of the Propper "Trouser Combat, Desert MARPAT Camouflage, FR Bradley 2" in Small-Reg. I take it these are what everyone is calling FROG? It doesnt have the same square FROG picture logo as my Crye FROG combat shirt... Just has the average military style tag (NSN 8415-01-546-9992.
My question is if these pants are in good condition, are they valuable because theyre a little harder to find? Whats a pair in decent condition sell for typically? thanks much for the info!
oceanfront wrote:thanks for the info. But i assume theyre worth something lol. Only pants ive come across is typical issue desert and woodland MARPAT. never seen the FROG stuff. I dont want to get in a discussion on value becuase this prob isnt the forum for it (im new member) but would it be worth my time to Ebay it or are they just too common and wouldnt be worth the effort? Ive been selling some Crye Navy custom AOR1 pants and those are sure worth the effort!! lol
Conker wrote:Just as a heads up, there's also a woodland MARPAT FROG set. Haven't seen one for sale yet (though MIL guys can get them directly from Propper) but they're out in Afghanistan and have been for at least a couple weeks!
|
|