![NEW DPDU , BA , Pouches 20100520adf8206488_154_lo](https://2img.net/h/www.defence.gov.au/op/afghanistan/gallery/2010/20100524/20100520adf8206488_154_lo.jpg)
![NEW DPDU , BA , Pouches 20100520adf8206488_159_lo](https://2img.net/h/www.defence.gov.au/op/afghanistan/gallery/2010/20100524/20100520adf8206488_159_lo.jpg)
![NEW DPDU , BA , Pouches 20100520adf8206488_172_lo](https://2img.net/h/www.defence.gov.au/op/afghanistan/gallery/2010/20100524/20100520adf8206488_172_lo.jpg)
![NEW DPDU , BA , Pouches 20100521adf8206488_106_lo](https://2img.net/h/www.defence.gov.au/op/afghanistan/gallery/2010/20100524/20100521adf8206488_106_lo.jpg)
![NEW DPDU , BA , Pouches 20100521adf8206488_117_lo](https://2img.net/h/www.defence.gov.au/op/afghanistan/gallery/2010/20100524/20100521adf8206488_117_lo.jpg)
![NEW DPDU , BA , Pouches 20100521adf8206488_118_lo](https://2img.net/h/www.defence.gov.au/op/afghanistan/gallery/2010/20100524/20100521adf8206488_118_lo.jpg)
![NEW DPDU , BA , Pouches 20100521adf8206488_172_lo](https://2img.net/h/www.defence.gov.au/op/afghanistan/gallery/2010/20100524/20100521adf8206488_172_lo.jpg)
HAHAHA ... but they seems not really like it ~~~~ LOL
![NEW DPDU , BA , Pouches 20100521adf8206488_177_lo](https://2img.net/h/www.defence.gov.au/op/afghanistan/gallery/2010/20100524/20100521adf8206488_177_lo.jpg)
![NEW DPDU , BA , Pouches 20100521adf8206488_236_lo](https://2img.net/h/www.defence.gov.au/op/afghanistan/gallery/2010/20100524/20100521adf8206488_236_lo.jpg)
![NEW DPDU , BA , Pouches 20100521adf8206488_241_lo](https://2img.net/h/www.defence.gov.au/op/afghanistan/gallery/2010/20100524/20100521adf8206488_241_lo.jpg)
![NEW DPDU , BA , Pouches 20100521adf8206488_257_lo](https://2img.net/h/www.defence.gov.au/op/afghanistan/gallery/2010/20100524/20100521adf8206488_257_lo.jpg)
![NEW DPDU , BA , Pouches 20100521adf8206488_270_lo](https://2img.net/h/www.defence.gov.au/op/afghanistan/gallery/2010/20100524/20100521adf8206488_270_lo.jpg)
![NEW DPDU , BA , Pouches 20100521adf8206488_273_lo](https://2img.net/h/www.defence.gov.au/op/afghanistan/gallery/2010/20100524/20100521adf8206488_273_lo.jpg)
Feindflug wrote:here's a bit more info in an article of The Australian
The Australian
Camo_fiend wrote:The new pattern seems almost like a hybrid between DPCU & DPDU.
I had heard (and saw through photos) that the current DPCU was working fairly well in Afghanistan, due to the balance of green & arid colouration in the pattern. When did the push for a different camo come around?
filupe wrote:Great ... another Auscam variant to hunt down ...
If they have little money to spend, before making a costly decision; learn from us American's mistake in regard to camouflage -- there is no such thing "one size fits all" for every environment.peace_benny5405 wrote:Because they want to save the cost of it , they are trying to make one camo to replace DPCU and DPDU. ADF is very poor .
Camo_fiend wrote:If they have little money to spend, before making a costly decision; learn from us American's mistake in regard to camouflage -- there is no such thing "one size fits all" for every environment.peace_benny5405 wrote:Because they want to save the cost of it , they are trying to make one camo to replace DPCU and DPDU. ADF is very poor .
peace_benny5405 wrote:DPCU is awesome in Autume and Fall Hong Kong . prefect , see below picture , how many people in it .
i agree with you , but how about DPDU seems better in Iraq ? so i think every countries want to make a camo for every environment . Multicam seems the best to do it.
|
|