There's ghosts of the Australian Army patch on the left shoulder, and of a nametape over the right breast pocket. Oddly enough though, there are no tags?
I'm just happy to have the uniform, I love this pattern!
Camo_fiend wrote:And for the record, I had no idea the Aussies manufactured the shirt in one fabric and the trousers in another, although the logic behind the trousers being in a thicker material due to facing heavier "wear and tear" conditions makes sense. I learned something new.
Camo_fiend wrote:
Are the newer Land125 uniforms the same way, or is the uniform all in one type of fabric suitable for standing up to general wear and tear?
Camo_fiend wrote:Thanks, Gary. It's quickly become one of my favourite sets, just because the pattern is so neat!
After losing the bid for a Russian uniform earlier that week, I went after this one with a vengeance; I wasn't going to lose 2 uniforms in one week!
I lost the other uniform by ONE dollar, I was extra-mad.Easy Gee wrote:Sometimes I still get mad afterwards...muttering to myself..."I would not have minded,paying an extra quid, the b*****ds, etc., etc."
Still good things come to those who wait
Camo_fiend wrote:I lost the other uniform by ONE dollar, I was extra-mad.Easy Gee wrote:Sometimes I still get mad afterwards...muttering to myself..."I would not have minded,paying an extra quid, the b*****ds, etc., etc."
Still good things come to those who wait
And winning the OzCam was luck -- if I'd have gotten home 5 minutes later than I did to check the auction, I'd have lost.
Camo_fiend wrote:I'm a cheapskate when it comes to surplus on eBay... once it gets above $40 or so I back off, unless I'm REALLY after it. And even then I stop myself at $60 for used uniforms.
eBay can indeed become a giant hole that one just pitches money into, that's for sure...
Zane wrote:Camo_fiend wrote:And for the record, I had no idea the Aussies manufactured the shirt in one fabric and the trousers in another, although the logic behind the trousers being in a thicker material due to facing heavier "wear and tear" conditions makes sense. I learned something new.
What you got there seems to be from different series. The thicker one would be earlier dated. The uniforms material is the same for pants and shirts, but the material used changed sometime before 2002. Cost savings and what not. Got to remember uniforms are made by the lowest bidder.
So it sounds like the shirt is Pre-Land125 and pants before the shirt. So not a "true" set, but aussies mix and match so it's all good, or use it as an excuse to get more auscam.
2ndAIF wrote:Zane wrote:
What you got there seems to be from different series. The thicker one would be earlier dated. The uniforms material is the same for pants and shirts, but the material used changed sometime before 2002. Cost savings and what not. Got to remember uniforms are made by the lowest bidder.
So it sounds like the shirt is Pre-Land125 and pants before the shirt. So not a "true" set, but aussies mix and match so it's all good, or use it as an excuse to get more auscam.
No this is not right the pants are supposed to be made of a heavier/thicker material, I can just see them hanging on the hanger inside the shirt and they look alright to me, This has always been the case with Australian combat uniforms since ww2 to present day land 125 cut with exception of the "lightweight" JG combat trousers trialed in Vietnam in 1970 they ripped too easily and they quickly withdrawn and then we changed back to the heavier material. so yes mate the pants would be corret for the shirt as long as the side map pockets on the leg are square and not pleated on the front. $45 for a set in that condition seems like you got them at a fair price to me, And If you want to finish it off shoulder biscuits, name tapes and ranks are relatively cheap and easy to find up for these as well.
Regards Lucas
Zane wrote:
Well there you have it. . . don't listen to my stupid ass.
When it comes to Auscam listen to an aussie.
Camo_fiend wrote:It's all good -- this has been a learning experience for us all!
Update: I found a VERY faded tag on the trousers, on one of the pockets, dated 1991. Solves the mystery of the pants, but I am completely stumped as to the shirt, since there's no tag at all I can find, but no traces of any tags being cut out either...
|
|