MVS Belt and Harness

Issue for Infantry as an alternative to the MVS, uses same pouches, there is also a set of p[anel that can be attached to the harness to allow chest carriage. This is the size M belt, the placement of the rear loop locks for the harness is out of alignment. On the L this isn't a problem, however the L is excessively long.

Another pic with the chest panels attached

This may be a silly question but Why are the Army's web gear sets in Tan and not NZDPM like the belt order webbing?

Because of MCU.......

There are rumours that future packs,vests,webbing will come in MCU, but who knows, we should just stay with cb, will make it easier when we drop MCU for the next fad.

I know that MCU pack covers were promised..............not sure when that will actually eventuate. One advantage of CB/CT is the major overseas manufacturers are making it for various spec gear.

Compared to the Other vests the Army have had, What are these harness sets like?

Panels, rather complicated fitting system.