This is the current-issue combat shirt worn by Latvian military personnel.
![Under the Armour Combat Shirt Resampled_2012-04-16_19-38-13_659](https://2img.net/h/i203.photobucket.com/albums/aa280/Rafterman000/Mobile%20Uploads/Resampled_2012-04-16_19-38-13_659.jpg)
![Under the Armour Combat Shirt Resampled_2012-04-16_19-38-22_175](https://2img.net/h/i203.photobucket.com/albums/aa280/Rafterman000/Mobile%20Uploads/Resampled_2012-04-16_19-38-22_175.jpg)
Label
![Under the Armour Combat Shirt Resampled_2012-04-16_19-38-13_659](https://2img.net/h/i203.photobucket.com/albums/aa280/Rafterman000/Mobile%20Uploads/Resampled_2012-04-16_19-38-13_659.jpg)
![Under the Armour Combat Shirt Resampled_2012-04-16_19-38-22_175](https://2img.net/h/i203.photobucket.com/albums/aa280/Rafterman000/Mobile%20Uploads/Resampled_2012-04-16_19-38-22_175.jpg)
Label
Camo_fiend wrote:Good estimation Gary. I'm really not sure why this piece lacks an NSN. Perhaps the pattern hasn't been entered into the NATO stock system yet?
As far as I can gather, NFM had the primary contract to manufacture these specifically for the Latvian MoD, (and no commercial copies exist that I know of) so the lack of an NSN is puzzling.
I understand what you're saying about that for sure, and indeed it could be a whole new thread.Easy Gee wrote: Just that it's not a home produced item, but then saying that how many nations farm their kit out to other national manufacturers, that could be the start of a whole new thread in it'self.![]()
|
|